Sometimes Jesus cited scripture to show
others what they must do to fulfill it. Such is the case at Mark
14:27 (Matthew 26:31).
The reason Jesus said, “ it is
written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be
scattered,” was to orchestrate the behavior of the eleven to
achieve the desired result that nothing be lost. (John 18:9)
The fleeing of the disciples from the
scene of the arrest was not a failure of the disciples to be loyal to
Jesus, as it has been misunderstood to be by Christians and
non-Christians alike, but it was a success by them in discerning the
will of Jesus and in denying themselves in order to follow him.
(Matthew 16:24)
The disciples of Jesus loved him and
wanted to prove their loyalty to him. They wanted to stand by him as
he faced his adversaries. They all said, “If I should die with you,
I will not deny you in any wise.” (Mark 14:31) When they said it,
though, they did not realize that if they should die with him
willingly, they would be denying him selfishly by that act – they
would be savoring neither a thing of God, who scripted the
scattering, nor a thing of Jesus, who saw in it the achievement of
the result that nothing be lost – they would be savoring a thing of
men. This is why they were offended in him: He denied them the
opportunity to stand with him and fight, to demonstrate their loyalty
in a way that men understand.
When Jesus said, “it is written . . .
,” he established a cue to signal them to scatter. When it became
necessary that they scatter, Jesus said, “ . . . but the scriptures
must be fulfilled.” (Mark 14:49b) “And they all forsook him and
fled.” (Mark 14:50) It is unlikely that they understood that they
had to flee in order to follow him until he cued them, until he told
them that what was written must be fulfilled. This is obviously true
of Simon Peter, who, before Jesus cued them, attacked Malchus, the
servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear. (John 18:10)
Nevertheless, when he cued them, they forsook him physically to be
with him spiritually. They obeyed his declaration that what was
written must be fulfilled.
Today, those who say that the disciples
of Jesus were deficient in their duty to him when they fled from the
scene of the arrest are guilty of savoring not the thing of God, but
that of men. As a consequence, they judge the disciples of Jesus in
this matter according not to righteous judgment, but to appearance.
If you have difficulty understanding
the case of Mark 14:27 as an example of Jesus orchestrating the
behavior of the eleven, it is unlikely you will readily understand
the case of John 13:18 as an example of Jesus orchestrating the
behavior of the one.
Nevertheless, I make this declaration
only in my own name.
No comments:
Post a Comment