With regard to trespasses in general, Jesus taught his disciples to forgive those who trespass against them. He said, “if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you,” and, “if you forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” (Matthew 6:14-15)
With regard to the trespass of a
brother, Jesus taught his disciples to “go and tell him his fault
between thee and him alone.” (Matthew 18:15)
When Judas Iscariot trespassed against
Jesus by making a covenant to deliver him to the chief priests
(Matthew 26:14-16), he gave Jesus an opportunity to give his
disciples an example of how they ought to respond to a trespass
against them.
In turn, Jesus took advantage of that
opportunity and gave them that example.
The Gospel of John narrates in a
literal, straight-forward, matter-of-fact manner the response of
Jesus to the trespass against him. The narration runs approximately
from John 13:1 to John 13:18, and it depicts Jesus washing the feet
of his disciples, stating to them that one of them is not clean,
associating the uncleanness with a part of the foot, and declaring to
them that he has given them an example.
The development of the strategy of the
foot washing and the success of carrying out that strategy are
testaments to the genius and the godliness of Jesus.
Unfortunately for readers of the
matter-of-fact account of the foot washing, the meaning of the action
is not stated explicitly so that they are put into a position like
that of the Jews whom Jesus taught in parables and withheld an
explanation of his parables. (Matthew 13:10-11)
The problem arises in understanding the
foot washing because the action is symbolic and the words are
equivocal. Jesus concealed the meaning of the foot washing from all
but Judas in order to meet the condition, “between thee and him
alone,” as mentioned above.
Jesus didn't
explain to his disciples what he had done to them. Instead, he
declared that he had given them an example. The knowledge of the
identity of what he exemplified, as he told Peter, would be disclosed
at an unspecified time, “hereafter.”
Since the only
uncleanness that Jesus identified among the disciples was that of the
one who should deliver him up (Jesus withheld this information from
his disciples, but the evangelist gives it to us), if that
uncleanness remained after the washing, then the washing, in and of
itself, had no value. In that case, since a foot washing was the task
of a humble servant, perhaps Jesus exemplified humble service, or at
least the supposed humility (it seems to me that the supposition
itself is a display of arrogance) that such service requires of one.
But if what Jesus
washed was clean afterward, then the foot washing had value as a
washing, and that value was the removal of an offense, or, in other
words, a forgiveness of a trespass. In that case, the foot washing
symbolized the forgiveness of Judas for his trespass against Jesus,
and it exemplified for the disciples of Jesus that, just as Jesus
forgave the one who trespassed against him, so should they forgive
the trespasses of one another.
Still, I offer these words only in my
own name.
No comments:
Post a Comment